Henry Field (December 15, 1902 – January 4, 1986) was an American anthropologist and archaeologist. On page 154 of his book “Fieldmuseum of Natural History” (1939), Field states:
“Physical anthropologists are certain that Mesopotamia was the eastern borderline for Semitic types of individuals and that the Semites, whom we know as the brown Mediterranean peoples who invaded Mesopotamia from Arabia, did not inhabit Iran at an early date. […] Nor did Nordic peoples speaking an Indo-Iranian language dwell in Iran in early times; the earliest evidence indicating their entry is dated to the beginning of the second millennium B.C. and is based on the mention of Indo-Iranian deities among Kassite gods.”
“Fieldmuseum of Natural History” by Henry Field, page 154 (1939) Field Museum of Natural History
So who were these “brown Mediterranean” people that he was speaking of?
In case there was any doubt or confusion as to who these brown Mediterraneanpeople were, an arm of the United Nations, the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization — UNESCO — has already ruled that they were in fact Negroes, just like the ancient Egyptians who were related to them:
(This is the same source I used in my previous post dealing with the ancient Israelite skulls. In that post I proved ancient Israelites had skulls exactly identical to the ancient Egyptians, who were in fact Negroes, according to this source from the United Nations. This time, we will be using the same quote from the United Nations source, except we will be using a different part of the quote. Pay close attention to the parts in bold.)
“The point about all these conclusions is that despite their discrepancies the degree to which they converge proves that the basis of the Egyptian population was negro in the Pre-Dynastic epoch. Thus they are all incompatible with the theories that the negro element only infiltrated into Egypt at a later stage. Far otherwise, the facts prove that it was preponderant from the beginning to the end of Egyptian history, particularly when we note once more that ‘Mediterranean’ is not a synonym for ‘white’, Eliot Smith’s ‘brown or Mediterranean race being nearer the mark’. ‘Elliot-Smith classes these Proto-Egyptians as a branch of what he calls the brown race, which is the same as Sergi’s ‘Mediterranean or Eurafrican race’. The term ‘brown’ in this context refers to skin color and is simply a euphamism for negro. It is thus clear that it was the whole of the Egyptian population which was negro, barring an infiltration of white nomads in the proto-dynastic epoch…”
“General History of Africa: Ancient civilizations of Africa” by G. Mokhtar, page 29-30 (1991) United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africa
Yes I’ve Heard from um lets see a Tel Aviv son of Japheth to find such claim to be true too there are even ways I’ve seen in Orthodoxy when I was studying it (still am) as Jews being Black so I’m really surprised no one speaks on Orthodoxy addressing,the Jews and the Messiah just like sometime ago Black saints were said to be in 13th century paintings..